Zapier
Paid plan for five actions
A five-action Zap needs a paid plan even when its task count fits the Free allowance. Professional covers 150 runs and Team covers 400 under this simplified model. Required apps and features still need a plan check.
Automation pricing
Compare Zapier, Make, and n8n using your monthly workload. See the plan limits, billing differences, and sources behind each estimate.Compare Zapier, Make, and n8n using your monthly workload, with plan limits and sources included.
IN THIS COMPARISON Zapier Make n8n
Use-case assistant
Use this fallback when a preset does not fit. Explain what runs, how often, and whether it polls for updates; the calculator remains available without it.
Going live soonThe assistant is being connected. The calculator and guides below are available now; recommendations and answers will come from the verified pricing API once it is live.
Cost calculator
Interactive model
Based on dated listed prices
01 / Your inputs
Choose an example or enter your own totals. Company size scales the example only.
Updated 22 September 2026
Choose a workflow
Examples are illustrative, not measured industry data.
Choose a workflow to load an illustrative starting point; company size will scale its base monthly runs.
1 Solo · 2 Startup · 3 Mid-market · 4 Enterprise
Startup
Or use a workload preset
These existing scenarios load fixed totals independently of the use-case model.
How many workflows contribute to these monthly totals.
Each step performed after a trigger.
How often all workflows execute in a month.
Each action performed after the trigger.
Extra scheduled checks counted in the Make estimate.
02 / Your comparison
Choose a preset or enter your monthly workload.
Lowest listed base fee covering modeled usage; prices observed 22 September 2026.
Enter your monthly workload to compare the listed plans.
Effective rate uses the actions entered and monthly-billing prices.
| Platform | Listed usage tier | Monthly range | Range / 1k actions |
|---|
Build your workflow
Choose a trigger, add up to eight action steps, and set monthly runs. The live comparison uses monthly-billing listed prices observed 22 September 2026. It is an illustrative estimate, not a measured bill.
Polling vs webhook
An illustrative two-action workflow handles 500 new leads each month. Scheduled polling checks every five minutes; webhook mode waits for a new lead event.
Polling bills checks even when nothing changed in the Make model used here. Zapier counts post-trigger tasks, while n8n counts whole executions, so this page does not add a separate polling line to either. For n8n, include every scheduled workflow start in monthly runs, even if it finds no new data.
Head to head
Listed base-plan prices and allowances observed 22 September 2026. Monthly billing powers the calculator; annual-equivalent prices are reference points only.
| Platform | Base plan prices | Included allowance | One billable unit | Polling treatment here | Overage approach | Self-host | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zapier | Monthly: Free $0 /mo · Professional $29.99 /mo · Team $103.50 /moAnnual equivalent: Free $0 /mo · Professional $19.99 /mo · Team $69 /mo | Free 100 · Professional 750 · Team 2,000 tasks | Each action performed after the trigger. The trigger itself is free in this model. | No separate polling line; the estimate counts post-trigger tasks. | Zapier’s pay-per-task overage rate is not publicly listed, so overages are not modeled. | No self-host option included here. | Fast setup for common app-to-app workflows. |
| Make | Monthly: Free $0 /mo · Core $16 /mo · Pro $28 /mo · Teams $51 /moAnnual equivalent: Free $0 /mo · Core $12 /mo · Pro $21 /mo · Teams $38 /mo | Free 1,000 credits; Core, Pro, and Teams figures shown at 10,000 credits | Each action and polling check counts as one credit in this model. | Polling checks are added to actions as credits. | Not modeled; the estimate stops at the listed plan limit. | No self-host option included here. | Visual control over branching and data transformation. |
| n8n | Monthly: Starter $24 /mo · Pro $60 /mo · Business (self-hosted) $960 /moAnnual equivalent: Starter $20 /mo · Pro $50 /mo · Business (self-hosted) $800 /mo | Starter 2,500 · Pro 10,000 · Business (self-hosted) 40,000 executions | One whole workflow execution, regardless of how many steps run inside it. | Include scheduled starts in monthly runs, even when no new data is found. | Not modeled; the estimate stops at the listed plan limit. | Yes. Infrastructure, maintenance, and operating costs are excluded. | Technical teams needing flexible logic and deployment control. |
Break-even view
Estimated cheapest listed option by monthly workflow runs, after translating each billing model to the same five-action workflow with zero polling. This uses plan limits and monthly-billing prices observed 22 September 2026—not measured usage or a bill.
Illustrative arithmetic: five billed action steps per run, zero polling, monthly billing, observed 22 September 2026.
Paid plan for five actions
A five-action Zap needs a paid plan even when its task count fits the Free allowance. Professional covers 150 runs and Team covers 400 under this simplified model. Required apps and features still need a plan check.
0–2,000 runs
Free is cheapest through 200 runs at $0 /mo; Core remains cheapest from 201 through 2,000 runs at $16 /mo. Feature eligibility still needs checking.
2,001–10,000 runs
Starter covers 2,001–2,500 runs at $24 /mo, and Pro covers 2,501–10,000 at $60 /mo. Business is self-hosted and is excluded from the managed-plan calculator. Above 10,000 runs, obtain current capacity pricing. These ranges use the USD figures displayed by n8n’s official page on the observation date.
Tracking since September 2026
Updated 22 September 2026
Each entry records the observation date and source page. No like-for-like vendor price change was confirmed between the first two snapshots; source corrections and regional display differences are labeled rather than presented as price moves.
Cost lab
These eight workflows define a proposed test protocol. No measured results are published yet. Completed tests will include the setup, observed usage, limitations, and test date.
Method: hold workflow logic, input volume, and test window constant where platform differences allow; record plan, billable units, retries, and final invoice evidence. No result is shown before it is measured and checked.
Migration check
Start with the unit economics, then price the migration itself. These are illustrative differences from the five-action, zero-polling break-even model—not measured bills or guaranteed savings.
At 101–150 monthly runs, the normalized workload fits both Zapier Professional and n8n Starter. At 151–400 runs, the model moves Zapier to Team while n8n remains on Starter.
That arithmetic does not include n8n setup, hosting, maintenance, migration, or debugging time. A switch is more compelling when your workflows are multi-step and your team can support the technical overhead.
101–150 runs: Zapier $29.99 /mo; n8n $24 /mo
151–400 runs: Zapier $103.50 /mo; n8n $24 /mo
At 101–150 monthly runs, Make Free still covers the normalized workload while Zapier moves to Professional. At 201–400 runs, Make moves to Core while Zapier moves to Team.
The trade-off is operational rather than purely financial: Make’s visual scenario model is more detailed, and polling or operation-heavy designs can consume credits faster than this zero-polling example assumes.
101–150 runs: Make $0 /mo; Zapier $29.99 /mo
201–400 runs: Make $16 /mo; Zapier $103.50 /mo
Before deciding: verify current list prices, rebuild one representative workflow, and compare actual billable units. Annual discounts, taxes, add-ons, overages, engineering time, and downtime risk can outweigh the base-fee difference.
Migration checklist
Choose a source and destination to generate a practical sequence. The checklist stays deliberately platform-neutral: it does not assume migration tools or one-click import features.
Product guide
Each platform can handle everyday automation. The more useful distinction is how you prefer to build, manage, and pay for the work.
LLM-native alternatives
For recurring work that is mostly reasoning, writing, research, or code, an AI subscription may replace a small automation stack. These tools are complements—not full substitutes for deterministic, multi-app orchestration.
Cloud-run coding and repository work that should recur or respond to an API call or GitHub event—such as maintenance, audits, issue triage, and report generation.
When the job is chiefly a prompt plus code context, it can avoid translating the work into a long chain of nodes, app actions, and usage units.
It is a research preview. Agent output still needs review, and it offers less conventional multi-app branching, connector breadth, and deterministic control than a workflow platform.
Personal recurring prompts: briefings, reminders, summaries, planning check-ins, and other simple work that does not need a visual workflow or many app handoffs.
It is quick to set up when the workflow is the instruction itself, especially for someone already paying for ChatGPT. Tasks can run without the app being open.
The active-task cap is commonly described as about 10, but plan availability and limits can change. Triggers and branching are narrower, and agent reliability varies by request.
Simple recurring research, summaries, and planning prompts for people already using Gemini and paying for Google AI Pro.
It removes the cost and setup of a separate workflow service when one schedule and one prompt describe the entire job.
The scheduled-action cap is reported at roughly 10 and may vary. It is not designed for deep multi-app branching, broad event triggers, or outputs that must be perfectly repeatable.
X-native monitoring, trend tracking, and recurring social-listening prompts that benefit from Grok’s access to live X data. Hourly, daily, weekly, or custom schedules can deliver results in-app or, on supported paid access, by email.
It keeps the prompt, schedule, model choice, and X context in one place. Prebuilt and custom skills can also make reusable instructions or workflows quicker to run than rebuilding them as nodes.
Its X-centric advantage does not transfer to every workflow. The product is still moving from Tasks toward Automations, and its multi-app connector story is thinner than Zapier, Make, or n8n. Scheduled automations are described as broadly available, while email triggers may require SuperGrok.
Choose an LLM-native scheduler when the work is prompt-led, lightly triggered, reviewable, and already covered by a subscription. Choose Zapier, Make, or n8n when you need reliable app-to-app handoffs, branching, retries, structured data movement, and an operational trail.
Pricing FAQ
Concise answers based on the same listed-price observations used throughout this page. Figures were observed 22 September 2026 and are not live quotes.
Learn
A plain-language field guide to the terms you will meet while comparing, building, and paying for automations.
An API is a defined way for one piece of software to ask another piece of software for data or an action.
When Zapier, Make, or n8n creates a contact in another app, it is often making an API request behind the scenes. The API determines what the platform can read or change. A missing API feature can limit an automation even when a platform supports the app.
An endpoint is a specific API address for one kind of request, such as finding an order or creating a customer.
Think of an API as a building and an endpoint as the door for a particular service. Built-in app connections usually hide these addresses from you. In a custom request step, you may choose the endpoint and the data sent to it yourself.
A webhook is an automatic message one system sends to another when something happens.
An order system can notify Zapier, Make, or n8n the moment a purchase is completed, so the workflow does not have to keep checking. Webhooks are usually faster and waste fewer usage units than repeated scheduled checks. They work only when the sending system offers the event you need.
Polling means checking an app on a schedule to see whether anything has changed.
It is the fallback when an app cannot send an instant webhook. A five-minute schedule checks more often than an hourly one, which can affect both speed and usage. This calculator treats polling as a separate input because its billing effect differs by platform; see the billing glossary for the model used here.
MCP is a standard that lets an AI assistant connect to tools and data sources through a common interface.
Instead of building a one-off connection for every assistant and service, an MCP server can describe the tools the assistant may call and the information it may read. That matters here because automation platforms are increasingly becoming the tools AI agents act through—for example, letting an assistant start a workflow that updates a CRM or retrieves an approved record. MCP does not remove the need for permissions, reliable workflows, or human review.
OAuth is a sign-in and permission process that lets one service access another account without receiving your password.
It is the familiar “Connect” flow used by many app integrations. You approve a stated set of permissions, and the connection receives a limited token instead of your login credentials. Connections can expire or be revoked, so a working automation may occasionally need to be reconnected.
An API key is a secret string an app uses to identify and authorize a connection.
Some services use a key instead of OAuth when you connect them to Zapier, Make, or n8n. Anyone with the key may be able to use the access it grants, so it should be stored in the platform’s protected credential field rather than pasted into workflow notes. If it is exposed, replace it and update the connection.
A rate limit is a cap on how many requests an app will accept within a period of time.
A workflow can stay within its automation plan and still be slowed or rejected by the connected app’s API limit. Bursts—such as processing a large import all at once—are more likely to hit one. Queues, delays, and careful retries can spread the work without losing records.
JSON is a common text format for organizing data as named fields, lists, and values.
A webhook might send a customer’s name, order number, and items as JSON. Zapier, Make, and n8n can map those fields into later steps without requiring you to write the format by hand. When a field is missing or nested differently, the workflow may need a parsing or fallback step.
An integration or app connection is a reusable link between an automation platform and another service.
It combines authentication with the triggers and actions the platform has prepared for that app. A listed integration does not guarantee every feature of the app is available. Before choosing a platform, check that the exact event and action your workflow needs are supported.
A trigger is the event or schedule that starts an automation.
“New form response,” “invoice paid,” and “every weekday at 9:00” are all triggers. A trigger may arrive instantly through a webhook or be found later through polling. The trigger choice affects how quickly the workflow starts and sometimes how usage is counted.
An action or step is one piece of work performed after the trigger, such as sending a message or updating a record.
One run can contain several steps, including conditions and data changes. Zapier and Make generally meter work at the task, action, module, operation, or credit level, while n8n’s listed hosted plans in this guide meter complete executions. See the billing glossary for the exact counting assumptions used by this page.
A scenario, workflow, or Zap is the full automation: its trigger, rules, and actions from start to finish.
Make calls it a scenario, n8n calls it a workflow, and Zapier calls it a Zap. The names differ, but each describes the saved logic that runs when its trigger fires. Compare what happens inside the automation, not just what the product calls it.
Error handling defines what a workflow should do when a step fails, while a retry attempts that step again.
Failures can come from expired connections, invalid data, app outages, or rate limits. A reliable workflow records the error, avoids duplicating completed work, and sends truly stuck cases for review. Retry controls differ across Zapier, Make, and n8n, so inspect the behavior you need before moving a critical process.
Billing glossary
The three platforms price different units. Translating them clearly is the first step toward a fair comparison.
Price-change alerts
Reference methodology
Pricing notes
This informational guide uses dated estimates from publicly listed base-plan pricing—not live prices, measured bills, or quotes. The calculator and break-even view use the monthly-billing figures observed above; annual equivalents are shown only for reference. Taxes, add-ons, self-hosting costs, overages, and usage beyond listed plan limits are excluded. Live pricing is planned for a later release.